Different Slants

Seeing the World from a New Angle

What About Cuba? A More Decent, More Compassionate Relationship With the United States……………………………… by Robert M. Katzman

Filed under: Friendship & Compassion,Humor,Politics — Bob at 1:54 pm on Thursday, August 28, 2008

So, let’s say it’s a perfect world and I’m President of The United States.

Which would mean a liberal, informed, and culturally aware Democrat with green sensibilities and no overwhelming desire to invade some other country and kill thousands of civilians, while at the same time being overwhelmingly concerned about this country, its people and the condition of America’s infrastructure.

I know, I know.  A total fantasy, as of this date.

But, who knows?  Something wonderful could happen.

Among the many, many changes and improvements I’d put into action, beside what I wrote in my earlier blog (6/12/08): Obama! A Blueprint for America (Written a few months ago. Check it out.), I’d change America’s relationship with Cuba.

Cuba, a country slightly larger than Ohio, about 11,800 sq. miles, with about the same population, 11,000,000 (though most likely a lot less Amish) is so rich in so many ways, so close to us, about 90 miles, and yet we hardly notice it. At least, because of the political influence of the Cubans already here, mostly in Florida, our cultural and economic ties with that island are few.   If the average American has any sense of the place, it is mostly likely through romantic movie images such as Marlon Brando and Jean Simmons in Guys and Dolls or the 2nd Godfather movie.  Or ancient political intrigue stories involving Fidel Castro, John F. Kennedy, the Bay of Pigs invasion disaster or the “Cuban Missile Crisis” dramatic standoff and Nikita Khrushchev.  All nearly 50 years ago, at this point.

And some old car enthusiasts find it romantic to think of Cuba as some Fifties car museum where all the cars driven after the revolution in 1959 are still there, undamaged by salt and parked everywhere like some permanent Hollywood movie set.

If ever there was a tropical paradise perfectly located for tourism, development and being regionally influential, it’s Cuba. Almost equally distant from the southeastern coast of the United States, Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula, the northern coast of Venezuela, Central America and within kissing distance of popular and prosperous islands of the Caribbean and the Bahamas, Cuba is a real estate investor’s dream.

Location, location, location.

I would call the president of Cuba, Raul Castro, ask how Fidel is doing and then casually suggest that we meet for lunch someplace nearby, like say…Miami, or Jamaica or maybe even Costa Rica, and talk about some things. We should keep everything light and friendly.  Because Raul might be suspicious of a president of a big industrial country that once tried to invade his little island 46 years ago in 1962, or who also contemplated killing his brother. I’d tell him to pick a place he likes and I’d be there. No big delegation of politicians or businessmen. No huge bodyguard. Just two guys.  Representing about 320,000,000 people.

I’d start out by expressing regret that we weren’t closer as countries, and as leaders, and then come right out and apologize for the half century of our being a threat to them and keeping our contacts to an absolute minimum. Raul wouldn’t expect it, it would suggest a completely different tone to our lunch meeting, and hopefully put him in a more receptive frame of mind, instead of being on guard and defensive before I said a word. It costs nothing to apologize–and as any wise husband will admit–and is essential in keeping potentially incendiary relationships on an even keel. It would save a lot of time and swiftly get across the idea that I came there to start fresh if he, too, was willing.

Then I’d tell him we want to return control of Guantanamo back to Cuba, and, if it seemed reasonable, then offer to pay Cuba a fair rent for it at market rates for the general region and develop the land and bay into a grand tourist destination for Americans or anyone else who wanted to come to it. That we would exclusively employ Cubans to build it, including whatever roads were necessary, and that income generated by the resort would generate taxes for Cuba.

I’d offer to normalize relations and let his people come to visit America and so on. I’d request that if this topic were interesting to Raul (he would call me Bob, of course) that I would be hopeful that the Cuban security police would promise to prevent a reoccurrence of that unfortunate previous expulsion by Cuba of ordinary people who wanted to leave for Miami, but among them were thousands of criminals, released from Cuba’s jails.  Friends don’t treat each other that way, and did he agree?

I would ask if American farmers could sell Cuba whatever they needed, and perhaps also help modernize Cuba’s own farms, for free of course. I would acknowledge Cuba’s reputation for excellent health care for its people and ask if any of our citizens could come to Havana and learn something from Cuba’s medical practices, and also, would Raul allow any of his doctors to work in America, especially in smaller rural areas that were underserved by U.S doctors.

If the doctors from Cuba would agree to that for a fixed minimum number of years, their salary would be subsidized by the Federal Government, they would receive a house free of charge–a nice, modern house–and that after ten years, if they wished, they could become American citizens, automatically. Or have dual citizenship, if Raul felt better about that.

By the time we were ready for dessert, I suspect Raul would ask me if he could come visit Disneyland. I’d respond that I would be willing to work out some efficient and inexpensive shuttle system employing both of our local airlines to bring day tripping Americans to Havana (or wherever) to add some hard cash to their economy.  Ditto for Cubans who wanted to visit Disneyworld or Miami for the day.

In an effort to stimulate their economy further, I’d ask if Americans could attend colleges in Cuba to better develop their language skills and make friends with other people while there. I’d ask if he would be willing to let American companies build (again employing local workers whenever possible) any other tourist destinations on the island and would it be acceptable for gambling to be legal there as well.

If Raul suggested, in return, that that was quite an interesting proposition for him to consider, as we thoughtfully puffed on our (Cuban) cigars. But it would be a lot more interesting to him if the Castro family were able to own a small piece of the action of whatever was built, in order to maintain the exceptional standard of living that he and Fidel had come to enjoy over the last 50 years. After an appropriate pause, suggesting I was thinking it over, I would quietly murmur that I had no objection to extremely focused… “Foreign Aid”… especially if it contributed to greater peace and prosperity between our two nations.

Or as my father put it to me in Yiddish, when I was a teenager,

“Ast du gehst, schmertz du”

Translating essentially that “as you grease the wheel, so goes the ride.”

Or in other words, if a small amount of bribery got the job done, he tried to explain to me, don’t be so aloof from the way the real world works that my inflexibility would kill any chance of accomplishing my ultimate goals.  As I grew older and acquired some real world experience in negotiating with people, I saw his wisdom more clearly.  There may be saints in heaven, but rarely on Earth.

Between the yacht traffic going back and forth between the USA and Cuba, necessary repairs to those yachts made there, winter storage, fishing trips, cruises, and a whole range of other business relationship possibilities that would benefit both countries, it could be a lift to both sides. More butter, less guns.

Perhaps America could supply Cuba with water turbines, windmills and a solar infrastructure to enable the island to become mostly energy independent to vastly reduce its total dependence on imported oil. With our cooperation and a different attitude all the way around, Cuba could, and should, be the central hub of tourism in the Gulf of Mexico. Its prosperity would be a blessing and all the countries in the area would gain from the increase in the standard of living of Cuba’s citizens.

As to Cuba’s communism?  Well, it’s not our country and we don’t control the world. I suspect that within a few years of vastly increased commerce between our countries, and a gradual rise in Cuba’s middle class, the politics of whoever was running the country would slowly liberalize, by choice, not by revolution. When a country has a solid middle-class, they want peace and stability for their families and businesses. Cuba would figure it out.  We did.

Lastly, after I retired from politics, and with a long ago (by then) very personal  signed agreement I’d received from Raul Castro safely in my pocket, after one of our many subsequent lunches together, I would leave the Washington press corps behind me and sail down to beautiful Cuba, to live out my remaining years in a beautiful cottage overlooking the sea.

Once I moved there, after an appropriate amount of time went by and the world forgot about me, I would go and visit some of my thousands upon thousands of perfectly preserved 1950’s era automobiles that Raul had quietly (and cheaply) bought up from his grateful citizens, and which he then promised to store for me until I retired from politics.

Within a short time and with the assistance of some recently retired CIA computer wizards (and now company shareholders, of course) a locally incorporated and privately owned “The Fonz Antique Auto Parts Supply“–the largest single collection of 1950’s auto parts in the entire world–would come into being, easing my sunset years.

Like I told Raul, years ago, anything that contributed to the continuing peace and prosperity between our two friendly nations………

 

Publishing News! 

Bob Katzman’s two new true Chicago books are now for sale, from him!
Vol. One: A Savage Heart  and Vol. Two: Fighting Words

Gritty, violent, friendship, classic American entrepreneurship love, death, heartbreak and the real dirt about surviving in a completely corrupt major city under the Chicago Machine. More history and about one man’s life than a person may imagine.

Please visit my new website: https://www.dontgoquietlypress.com
If a person doesn’t want to use PayPaI, I also have a PO Box & I ship anywhere in America.

Send me a money order with your return and contact info.
I will get your books to you within ten days.
Here’s complete information on how to buy my books:

Vol 1: A Savage Heart and Vol. 2: Fighting Words
My books weigh almost 2 pounds each, with about 525 pages each and there are a total together of 79 stories and story/poems.

Robert M. Katzman
Don’t Go Quietly Press
PO Box 44287
Racine, Wis. 53404-9998                                                                                                                    (262)752-3333, 8AM–7PM

Books cost $24.95 each, plus shipping

For: (1)$3.95; (2)$5.95; (3)$7.95; (4)$8.95 (5)$9.95;(6) $10.95

(7) $11.95; (8) $12.95; (9)$13.95 (10)$15.95 (15)$19.95

I am also for hire if anyone wants me to read my work and answer questions in the Chicago/Milwaukee area. Schools should call me for quantity discounts for 30 or more books. Also: businesses, bookstores, private organizations or churches and so on.

My Fighting Words Publishing Co. four original books, published between 2004 and 2007 are now out-of-print. I still have some left and will periodically offer them for sale on my new website.

 Twitter handle: bob_katzman

15 Comments »

Comment by Don Larson

August 28, 2008 @ 3:01 pm

I don’t know of any recent wars where we killed thousands of civilians. I know the enemy has killed thousands of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan so maybe you meant them instead?

I’m not a big fan of foreign aid to most countries, so Cuba would probably not be on my list. I say wait until that nation is almost at rock bottom and then allow private investors to buy the choice spots of real estate there.

I also think that the trade embargo with Cuba should be withdrawn. Far too many Americans want Cuban Cigars and they have to end-run too many laws to get them.

Don

Comment by Gela Altman

August 28, 2008 @ 9:04 pm

Yes, the embargo should have been lifted long ago. However, addressing the inconsistencies, the myths and the half truths in your ‘semi-serious’ proposal for dealing with Cuba would take entirely too long for a blog response. Suffice it to say that your naiveté boggles my mind.
I hope you had fun writing it!

Your Cuban friend.

Comment by Bob

August 28, 2008 @ 10:15 pm

To Don,
I think we and our partners in the irrational and barely planned current Iraq war have killed thousands of civilians, hopefully unintentionally.

I think the whole misadventure there is a terrible blot on the integrity of the people running our current government, a vast waste of men,machinery, money and our international reputation. I think it will stand as a classic example of men in power who have never experienced war themselves, and somehow see the enterprise as some sort of exciting movie, never comprehending on any level the terrible price they are asking their own soldiers to pay.

It will take years and a wise successor to repair the vile irresponsibility of the very small men who perpetrated a very big war. I would ask the world to believe that we are a better nation than we have demonstrated in our conduct of the war and our prisoners, and to accept our regret that morally, we temporarily lost our way.

Some people see admitting responsibility and flawed judgement as a sign of weakness. I see it as an example of maturity, honesty and courage. If you’re wrong, say so, and change your behavior as a person or as a country. And I love my country.

To Gela,
I invited you to respond, as one of only two Cubans I know, fully aware that you would feel free to cut my perspective to ribbons. You are a very smart lady, most likely know many people from a similar economic class as yourself, and have a particular point of view.

You also are very likely to know far more intimately than I could possibly know, what it was like to live in Cuba when you left it almost half a century ago.

Although I wrote what I felt in a gently humorous way, some of the time, I meant all of it where it concerned the people of Cuba, its potential as a very prosperous country and how America and Cuba would both benefit from a relationship based on friendship and mutual cooperation instead of the idiotic and sad conditions between us for the last fifty years.

I was looking at it from a human level, not as an expert on Cuba. I think many people would benefit from a more enlightened relationship between our two countries. If you feel that is naive, well, stick your neck out and express yourself. I did.

When I wrote about Armenia, a woman who knew far more than I did also was critical of my ideas and she expressed herself in detail. People who read the article saw both points of view and could make up their own minds about what they read. I know from my blog visitor statistics that people still read that article months after it was posted. I don’t mind that woman’s criticism of me, and I’m happy that she joined in the discussion. Everybody learned something.

So Gela, go ahead, tell people what you think about what I wrote and how you would handle relations with Cuba if you were president. Please ignore the cute ending about the old cars, because that was just fantasy, and you know it. Say what you believe to be true. I want to know.

Your American friend, and admirer,
Bob Katzman

(ps…I fixed the many spelling errors, even though you were very nice not to mention them)

Comment by Don Larson

August 28, 2008 @ 11:18 pm

Hi Bob,

I suspect that if the majority of undecided voters think a candidate will be an apologist, that candidate will not get their vote.

Personally, I do not see either candidate being an apologist right now. Any apologists running for President didn’t get very far and for a very good reason.

Don

Comment by Gela Altman

August 29, 2008 @ 4:58 am

Bob,

You asked me to say more. Well then, here is my response to some of your comments:

1. Sitting down with a dictator to negotiate ANYTHING is a myth.

2. You say that ‘If ever there was a tropical paradise perfectly located for tourism, development and being regionally influential, it’s Cuba’. This is a very confusing statement for a country that has never known democracy without corruption, and for a people who struggle daily just to survive in the prison that they call their home.

3. During the Mariel boatlift that started in April 1980 and ended in October of the same year only 2% or 2,746 Cubans were considered serious or violent criminals under U.S. law and therefore were denied asylum. The other 122,254 people who arrived during that Exodus became doctors, Lawyers, journalists, writers and ordinary citizens.

4. To say that Health Care in Cuba is good is misinformation. It is not for the masses. Cuba lacks medicines for the people but the elite associated with the government lacks nothing. You may also remember that when Castro became ill he was cared for by Spanish not Cuban doctors. So where were the excellent Cuban doctors?
Something happened to us while visiting Cuba several years ago. My son had a severe sinus infection, the kind that comes with a high fever, nausea and vomiting. Our small group included a physician. We entered a State run pharmacy since we knew that medicines were obtained by ‘simply’ approaching a ‘pharmacist’ and telling them the symptoms of the patient. As a native Cuban with a perfect Cuban accent I described the symptoms that my son was having and was given a bottle of medicine. Our friend the physician quickly read the uses of the medicine and said to me ‘This medicine is given for psychotic symptoms’. We left the pharmacy as quickly as we could.

5. Cuba trades with Canada, South America, and Europe. Does anyone wonder why it is that Cubans are hungry? Why they had an eye disease epidemic due to malnutrition several years ago? Why it has been common practice that Cubans who live in the Island will not be served in restaurants even when accompanied by their Cuban relatives who are visiting them. Does anyone ask why the Comandante has several palaces throughout the Island and no one ever knows where he is at any given time? Does anyone wonder why there is a crumbling infrastructure and why it is that the ordinary Cuban is being denied building materials to fix the dilapidated house where he lives, which by the way, he does not own, because everything belongs to the all mighty government.

One can blame the US embargo between now and the end of days for all the ills of Cuba. Common sense tells a different story.

See what I mean when I said that the response to your piece about Cuba is just too long and complicated?

GA

Comment by Bob

August 29, 2008 @ 7:20 am

Oh Gela,
What a terrific response. I guess you have to be really annoyed before you summon up the energy to set me straight and tell the world how conditions really are in a place I’ve never been to. I’m glad I bring that out in people. Usually.

I am grateful for your willingness to share what you know with the steadily growing audience of curious readers who come to http://www.DifferentSlants.com to read something fresh, funny, historic, political or moving about some topic they know nothing about. I am also glad to know your son survived his illness in Cuba.

One question: Do I have a perfect Chicago accent? In case some day I have to convince some city official that I’m really from here. That already happened to me in 1968 and I received a severe beating because the local official was not sufficiently convinced.

Maybe it’s a South Side accent. That may work against me if the next official is a Cubs fan. Different cities, different problems. What can you do?

By the way, a famous doctor who is periodically heard on a local radio station once diagnosed a chest pain I had as pluresy and he told me he would have to puncture my chest wall to drain out the fluid.

Except he was wrong. At the last minute, his very observant nurse, fortunately for me, told him he was looking at someone else’s x-ray chart. So a misdiagnosis can occur in a private enterprise democracy, too.

Your perspective on Cuba is valuable to me and I’m sure other people too, but as a person with totally different life experiences than you, I believe my ideas are good ones and would change Cuba for the better. It’s fine if you don’t agree, but I see logic and motivation in what I proposed. Also, I know it will happen. Probably the health care will improve as well, because the middle classes will demand it.

Let’s wait and see.

Muchas gracias, Senora Altman, and shabbat shalom, too.

Your American amigo,and fellow Polish Jew,

Bob

Comment by Don Larson

August 29, 2008 @ 9:00 am

“1. Sitting down with a dictator to negotiate ANYTHING is a myth.”

Yes, I agree.

That’s why we’re in Iraq because of that very well understood fact. We tried to negotiate and after far too many years of fruitless efforts, we forced the changes.

I have no guilt about Iraq, no apologies for our actions there.

Don

Comment by Walter Lippmann

August 29, 2008 @ 3:48 pm

Well, as someone who runs a news service focused on Cuba, and who travels there often, I took and shared your aspiration with 1240 other subscribers, and I hope that you get your wish fulfilled.

Normal relations, just like with Vietnam and China, that’s the way ahead. Thanks for your dream. I don’t think it’s that impractical. Washington broke relations with Cuba. Washington could take down the various walls it has erected, and we could both move forward.

Good luck to you.

Comment by Bob

August 29, 2008 @ 9:23 pm

Walter,
I am surprised to see you found my site and also that you appreciate my way of seeing the world as a better place. I am delighted when my logic appeals to others, especially when the goals are so worthy.

I’ve been to Northern Europe a number of times when I owned a world travel foreign-language bookstore years ago, before Barnes & Noble etc. came to my area in Chicago and killed all the little specialty bookstores. A terrible loss. I loved traveling around Scandinavia by train and sitting in their smokey coffee houses. Very warm, in all senses.

But I have never been to Cuba. I would love to go, someday, Walter. I’ve interviewed many people for my four published books and photographed them ,too.

A warm smile and a sincere handshake can break down a lot of barriers, if people’s hearts are on the same wavelength. So, maybe someday. Perhaps fortune will smile upon me and it will happen.

If my story made sense to you, in spite of my little humorous fantasies, and you felt it was sufficiently worthy to share with others you are connected to, then I’m honored and I thank you.

I sincerely see, and have for years, Cuba being as centrally located in north/south trade and as a transportation hub and recreational paradise, as Chicago is to the Midwest in America.

I’m not so brilliant, Walter, it’s simple logic. I believe Cuba’s future is inevitable and prosperous, too. Any open-minded person can see it clearly, on the map.

Thanks for reading my ideas. You may find my other non-fiction stories equally compelling and deeply felt. I hope so. Feel free to write to me anytime, too.

Bob Katzman

Comment by Russ

August 30, 2008 @ 5:08 pm

Bob, et. al.:

Cuba needs to be approached in the context of what should be our general, philosophically consistent way of dealing with the rest of the world.

Whatever sins we imputed to Fidel Castro and his threatening dalliance with the Soviet Union are history. To continue a cold war policy of treating Cuba as a pariah is ridiculous. What’s the point? To effect regime change in Cuba? It hasn’t worked for 60 years and it isn’t likely to be a factor in whatever evolution will occur in Cuba in the near future.

I know persons who have direct experience of Cuba and the totalitarian atrocities committed there would hope that the United States would not back off from the embargo or do any of the liberalizations that Bob recommended. Well, I can agree to the extent that some of the things proposed by Bob — apologies, foreign aid, etc. — are just as ridiculous as maintaining an embargo. Why on Earth would we even consider things like that? So Kennedy put out a hit on Castro. That was then. Rome sacked Carthage and sowed the ground will salt so nothing would grow there anymore. That doesn’t mean Italy can’t get along with Libya these days, no? But if we shun Cuba because it’s a despicable dictatorship, what about the other, oh, 75-100 despicable dictatorships in the world? Let’s return to our Washingtonian foreign policy of being skeptical but neutral regarding the rest of the world.

If apologies and foreign aid are required by Cuba for them to normalize relations with us (what chutzpah!), we should just say, “OK, you’re still pissed, call us when you’re over it — don’t try to reverse the charges. In the meantime, we’ll unilaterally allow travel, trade, and keep those cigars coming”.

Extending the trade subject just slightly, I believe the extent of our wall of tariffs, taxes, and other boundaries we have with other countries should be determined by a) the walls they maintain towards us, and b) (a smaller criteria) we should give advantages to those countries which have a human rights view like ours, and whose citizenry has developed into “first world” status due to those governments effecting those policies over time (or are well along the way).

So, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the U.K., most of Europe, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, South Africa, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Thailand, and Taiwan would get the human rights special treatment on trade relations (I might have left out some — don’t flame me). Cuba would have to wait (so would Mexico) until we could stop holding our collective noses when dealing with their government.

Comment by Bob Katzman

August 30, 2008 @ 10:02 pm

Bob replies:

Well gee, Russ, we probably don’t like the same movies either. Fortunately, there’s a whole world of movies to choose from. The average American can choose from thousands including video stores and specialty online sources. We can do something like that…here. I imagine the average intellectually curious Cuban can’t.

The point of my gentle piece was compassion and starting fresh. Helping the great mass of powerless Cubans by selectively finessing their greedy, grasping and manipulatable leaders by gradually making then irrelevant. Offering prosperity to the island as subtle political force instead of a Bay of Pigs approach. Guns should be the last resort, or never, depending on the goal and what price ought to be paid to achieve it.

I believe words matter. They can defuse a frozen situation and change an atmosphere. The can create an environment of trust, or the tentative beginnings of trust by two sides that want it, privately, but each is waiting for the other to make the first move.

My first move would be to get the hell out of their country and offer whatever apology would be necessary to move on and find a way to get past the past and help the Cuban people. That was my goal. It costs nothing to express regret for fifty years of failed policies, causing endless fear to defenseless women, children and old people and doing everything we could to make the Cuban population so miserable in the belief that they would overthrow their government. How God-like of us. How dare we treat another people that way.

I’ve extended the hand of friendship to nasty thieving people, and others who had some power over my life, as well. Some, surprised, took my hand, and shook it, and all the tension evaporated. They felt, I knew, that seeking peace with them was equivilent to being a supplicant and admitting weakness. They then chose to be magnanimous in accepting my offer which in their eyes, made them heroes. In their minds, they “won.”

I didn’t give damn about how they reasoned my offer. I had my eye on my objective and offered them nothing but words. Sometimes, most times, a gentle approach was the correct one and life went on, but was better.

Sometimes, I had the living shit kicked out of me by uncomprehending and unforgiving sons-of-bitches who seized the opportunity to hurt me, and did.

My choice, my risk. Coming from an irrationally violent life, I will always choose peace first if there seems to me to be the slightest possibility that it will be received and appreciated by my foes.

Russ, I think you were expressing your beliefs, honestly, about international political policy using tariffs and aid as carrots and sticks to accomplish American goals. The big picture.

I was suggesting that we bribe the aging little brother of Castro so we could peacefully liberate the suffering island from his arthritic clutches using construction, trade and good will as our only weapons and gradually make him irrelevant. I was seeking to help the Cuban people and subsequently the whole region. I was focusing on one specific goal. The small picture.

Words matter. Egos matter. Having suffered myself, I sought to stop many others from suffering in just one small place, because I believe it is an achievable goal. Period. I don’t give a damn what people think of me for offering peace and apologies. I wanted to help the people.

I welcome your opinions on topics I write about, however, at any time. Free discussion, without personal invective, in an open society is such a great idea. Who knows? Maybe I’ll learn something from you, Russ. That would be fine with me. Shalom.

Bob Katzman

Comment by Nancy Mikelsons

August 31, 2008 @ 8:14 pm

It’s okay to write about a country you’ve never visited, but it’s better to know some basic facts. Raul’s wife, a leader of the Revolution died about a year ago, so your idea of ‘inviting our wives’ indicates a fundamental lack of information on your part that takes away any respect that this visitor to Cuba of over 20 years could have for your ideas. Some of them are good, but I’m not sure you really know what you are talking about if you don’t know that the wife of the President of a country you are writing about is a) deceased and b) a major figure during the revolutionary struggle and c) the leader of the major feminist organization in the country. Efforts at half in jest/wholly in earnest humor are much more effective when the writer is well informed.

Comment by Russ

September 1, 2008 @ 1:32 pm

Hi Bob:

Your good heart and good intentions absolutely disqualify you from having the fiduciary responsibility of handling international relations as a representative of the people of the United States!

“Russ, I think you were expressing your beliefs, honestly, about international political policy using tariffs and aid as carrots and sticks to accomplish American goals. The big picture.”

My point is there is only the big picture when talking about relationships between 2 countries. The little-picture things (like having lunch with Raul, writing a check to some charity to help Cuba out) are best left to individuals responding to conscience and calling. This is still a relatively free country; more power to you.

“Who knows? Maybe I’ll learn something from you, Russ. That would be fine with me. Shalom.”

Well, Bob, you know what they say — recognizing shortcomings in one’s study habits is the first step towards recovery. 7:^) Sha-alu shalom Yerushalayam.

Comment by Bob

September 1, 2008 @ 11:44 pm

From Bob Katzman

Dear Nancy,
It’s much faster for me to respond to you this way.

Thanks for informing me about something I simply didn’t know. I have admitted I am not an expert about Cuba, but that I do care about it. I accept your criticism as sincere and not arbitrary. By your taking the time to write to me and set me straight, now many other people will learn something that perhaps they didn’t know either. So, please read on.

My including that particular line in my story wasn’t essential to express what I felt. So, in recognition of that, and that my not knowing Raul’s wife had died might be offensive to people more intimately aware of Cuban personalities, culture and history than I am, I removed any reference to wives in that paragraph.

Thanks for writing to me, Nancy. I am better off for your taking the time to do that, and so are my readers. I do hope you were able to appreciate my overall intentions to improve the conditions in Cuba for the average person, despite any specific errors in my story. I know I’m an easy target, in that regard. I hope you will read my other postings which are totally different in subject matter. Perhaps you might see me in a different and more positive light.

Bob Katzman

Comment by Walter Lippmann

September 7, 2008 @ 10:42 am

Never having been to Cuba doesn’t prevent the presidents of the United States or the top leaders of the U.S. government from making pronouncements about what kind of government WASHINGTON is willing to permit the Cuban people to have.

Even a hurricane doesn’t stop Washington from its endless propaganda barrage against Cuba today.

Bob’s well-intention, and could use more information, but his heart is obviously in a kind, caring place.
==================================================

Rice says time not right to lift embargo on Cuba
Sun Sep 7, 2008 9:23pm IST

RABAT (Reuters) – U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on Sunday that it would be unwise for Washington to lift an embargo against Cuba, despite its pleas following Hurricane Gustav.

Cuba spurned an offer from the U.S. to send hurricane victims $100,000 in aid through relief organisations and said on Saturday that the United States should instead sell it relief supplies and allow food sales on credit.

Rice said U.S. President George W. Bush had made clear that Washington would be “responsive” to the Cuban regime if it was prepared to free political prisoners and had a process for free and fair elections, among other reforms.

“We see nothing that suggests that has come about. What we can’t do is to have the transfer of power from one dictatorial regime to another. That is not acceptable,” she said during a visit to Morocco.

“I don’t think that in the context of what we see now that the lifting of the embargo would be wise,” she said.

The Bush administration permitted the sale of food to Cuba for cash in 2001 when Hurricane Michelle lashed the communist-run island nation.

The sales, allowed under an amendment to the decades-old U.S. trade embargo, have continued since then. But proposals in Congress to permit banks and companies to supply credit for the goods are opposed by the White House.

Gustav slammed into western Cuba damaging or destroying 100,000 houses and dealing a blow to agriculture. Hurrican Ike is now charging toward Cuba and was expected to arrive late on Sunday, severely threatening sugar cane fields, the tourist hotels of Varadero and the crumbling colonial buildings of Havana.

© Thomson Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.
Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>