Different Slants

Seeing the World from a New Angle

Is the Stimulus Package a Good Idea?

Filed under: Politics — Rick at 5:15 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2008

It looks like the Congress is going to pass a stimulus package (details to be determined) that gives American consumers about $150 billion dollars to do what they do best – consume. Why do we need this and how did the economy come to be is dire straits to begin with?

It seems to me that our problems are due to debts and deficits. The US savings rate has dropped below zero. As a nation, we spend every cent we earn plus a few more we borrow. Many have financed this prolonged binge by borrowing against the inflated values of their homes. The rest seem to have simply racked up enormous amounts of credit card debt at astronomical interest rates.

The US has also been running serious trade deficits for the past several decades. We seem to have lost our competitiveness in the world markets for most products other than entertainment and subsidized agricultural commodities. I may speculate on how this happened in a future article.

Last but not least, the federal government has been running huge deficits even by their own questionable accounting methods for the past 7 years. Shortfalls must be covered somehow and the two methods available are borrowing and printing more money. The government cannot borrow from Americans, we already spent everything we got plus some. So they borrow from other countries. China invests about one billion dollars in US securities every day. They hold around 1.5 trillion dollars worth today. Saudi Arabia is another big financier of US debt. Any remaining shortfall is made up by printing money.

Irrational exuberance at the printing press is known to cause inflation. Inflation, in turn, is a tax on savings. Many Americans seem to be safe here. However, those who behaved responsibly by saving for their retirement (as opposed to hoping the government would bail them out) are penalized while those who racked up big debts are rewarded as the value of the dollars they owe decline.

So now the economy is slowing as people reach their credit limits and the housing bubble deflates. One might expect to hear some debate over what went wrong, how to fix it, and what to do to keep it from happening again. But, this is an election year. If there is one thing both the “tax and spend” Democrats and the “borrow and spend” Republicans can agree on, it is to never oppose giving away money in an election year.

The plan going forward is to borrow our way out of debt. We will we will borrow $150 billion from China or somewhere else and give to Americans (though not the really poor) so they can go to Wal-Mart and buy more imported goods. That way, all our congress critters still have a good chance of getting re-elected even though the economy is in shambles.

Sounds like a good idea, doesn’t it?

4 Comments »

Comment by dwlarson

February 1, 2008 @ 11:16 am

Rick,

That’s a good explanation of the system, especially in an election year.

Americans have been lulled into complacency since the end of WWII. Over the next four years, I figure Americans will realize their complacency. I look forward to real debates for the 2012 election when America is ready for “real change.”

If “real change” doesn’t take place by 2016, I figure there won’t be much of America to worry about. So I expect a drastic change after 2012, one way or the other. Neither result is what most people would expect today.

Don

Comment by Bob

February 1, 2008 @ 4:15 pm

Well, Rick, the bright spot in all of this fiscal insanity is that neither China or Saudi Arabia will ever attack us—or else the value of all of our shrinking dollars will simply evaporate and they’re both screwed holding all their trillions of worthless dollars. Perhaps they’ll defend us, if India decides to take us over.

Then there’s the Bulgarian problem. Thousands of Bulgarians are pouring into America, illegally, and and taking all the jobs from the illegal Mexicans. There could be a stealth war for all the bad jobs in this country. And on top of it, if either side surrenders, they won’t be able to understand each other.

The other bright spot in this grim economic nightmare we’re experiencing now…..give me a minute here…. is…um….ok,I…uh…I guess there isn’t one.

Sorry.
Really sorry.

Bob Katzman

Comment by dwlarson

February 1, 2008 @ 10:49 pm

I’m starting to appreciate Bob’s comment more and more as I think about it.

In November we’re going to elect a new President. But, probably about 95% of the other city, state, and federal elected positions will be filled by the same people as now.

If Americans really wanted change, they would change-out every official in the next few elections. Don’t count on that!

Don

Comment by Bob Katzman

February 17, 2009 @ 1:05 pm

Well, Rick,
It’s now a year later.

I’ve been thinking. Maybe the Chinese should pay our government officials directly, at whatever the current market will bear. That way, they get rid of their shrinking dollars, and the congressman know who they’re actually working for and who they have to answer to. Meaning, not Iowa or Pennsylvania.

It would be simpler than their loaning us money, getting receipts or bonds for it, and then the US government pretending they actually have sufficient funds to pay all the senators and representatives.

I think the government should take away the paid for health care benefits package from elected government officials, too. Not vindictively, of course, but as a way of spreading the pain many Americans are feeling, more evenly. It might possibly affect the enthusiasm some members have for running again, although why would that be, pray tell?

Secondly, there may be some greater motivation for congress people to vote for the government to negotiate directly with the drug companies for the lowest possible prices, or else informing them that we (the government representatives) might want to go shopping for other drug providers in Europe or Asia.

Or, there might be some enthusiasm for creating some fee arrangement to allow the drug companies to maintain the privilige of selling their wares in this country. Renewable yearly,of course, in case of evidence of price gouging. Maybe a few billion a year,each, based on the size of the companies or some yardstick like that. The money could go to subsidize medical schools in rural parts of America or paying for doctors to work in depressed or underserved areas like that.

Why must public service be exalted? Serve, means to serve and not to “lord”. Like “serving” in the
army. Nothing first class there, especially after any of them are wounded. Give the congressmen the same stellar treatment our armed service personnel receive after being injured. What a concept!

All for one, and one for all, for a change. We are all in this together…or we aren’t.

Good article, Rick.

Bob Katzman

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>