Different Slants

Seeing the World from a New Angle

10 things that could really help the country (part 2)

Filed under: Uncategorized — Russ at 5:56 pm on Monday, September 1, 2008

A while back, I posted 5 things that could really help the country, with the full realization that none of them would ever get done by the current crop of statesmen underachievers vying to replace that frat-boy-meets-the Peter-Principle-to-the-Nth-power, Mr. G.W. Bush.

I promised the other 5, so here goes:

6. Penal Reform.
I’m sure everyone reading this has heard a joke along these lines: “well, he’s going to go the big house, where some large inmate named Bubba will think he’s real pretty” {everyone laughs, the implication being that the amorous attentions of Bubba are just desserts for whatever sins were committed — whether child molestation or getting a contempt of court order from some Family Law judge not impressed by that person’s bankruptcy being a reason for falling behind on some draconian payment decree}.

I hope I’m not the only one who doesn’t think this is funny.

If we as a society are going to smirk at and countenance the contributions of Bubba to the administration of Justice, then we should have the courage to be up front about it.

Judge: “I sentence you to 5 years in the state penitentiary, where, chances are, you will be savagely butt-raped repeatedly by some real bad-ass characters in there.”

No judge is going to say that, so why is our prison system in the kind of state where we just assume this is going to happen? What cowardliness that we would accept that outcome while not allowing the judge to say it? Isn’t the implicit acceptance of this status quo a horrible moral faux pas for the citizenry who by default allows this to happen?

I have no soft spot in my heart for nasty criminals at all. But this isn’t about them, it’s about us. A civilized society should exact punishment from its malcontents in a way that reflects the values of the civilized society, not the malcontents. So, what to do?

Our jails/prisons/penitentiaries should be bastions of labor supplying a service to the state. Yes, I actually like something like “Cool Hand Luke”, (given that in today’s ever present media eye spotlighting things, the sadism of the guards in that movie could never be repeated). Inmates should work off their “debt to society”. And with the focus on housing workers, rather than idle, brooding malcontents, measures could be taken to ensure that the Bubbas of this world would be denied opportunity for their sickening deeds.

Lest anyone think I have a bleeding heart for criminals, I think a prison run along my criteria would also have these characteristics:

* no TV, except for Discovery and the Science channel, and maybe some PBS

* no weight rooms (why make violent people stronger?)

* a well-thought out way of separating inmates from each other so that it would be diffcult to  contribute to the formation of or sustenance of factions or gangs. This shouldn’t be too hard: it could be as simple as the times of common contact with other inmates would be strictly regulated — no opportunity for the Aryan brotherhood to have time to connect with like minded inmates (or the Black gangs, or the Hispanic gangs).

I think service on the chain gang would go far in making certain this outcome. Nothing like an exhausting days work to put a damper on other activities.

While I’m at it: no death penalty. I say this not on moral grounds (I’d have no qualms at all about throwing the switch myself for most of these monsters ) but on practical grounds. We’ve made a complete mess of this punishment with our Byzantine system of rules and criteria (killing a cop is deserving of capital punishment but killing a hobo isn’t). Unless we as a society are willing to make capital punishment automatic for capital crimes (as defined in the 19th century) then we can’t administer it and pretend to be fair about it. There’s nothing inherently inferior about life without the possibility of parole.

Sentences generally  need to be lowered. But the time served needs to be harder (but safer — no Bubbas).  It’s obscene that 2 Border Patrol agents got 10+ years for shooting a drug trafficer in the butt. A two week suspension from work  and a letter of reprimand would have been more appropriate.

So in summary, my penal institution would look like this:

* inmates laboring their days, but with shorter sentences (for the most part).
* prison policy would guarantee the safety of inmates from Bubba, whatever that would take.
* sentences would be lighter than they are now, generally. I would not apply this to the child molesters and truly violent criminals who deserve life.

And of course (if your read any of my previous postings) half the prison population would go free, because these are the non-violent drug-related offenses that should not be the business of any government.

Well, I guess I have 4 more ideas for “things that will help improve the country” which I’m not going to get to today.  They are: infrastructure development, education reform, Immigration reform (talked about in previous posts), and voting rights rethought — a proposal for enfranchisement of the self-supporting and disenfranchisement of the non-self supporting.

Comments anyone?

3 Comments »

Comment by Bob

September 1, 2008 @ 11:17 pm

From Bob Katzman

Hey Russ,
First, thanks for taking the time to make Rick’s and my blog more interesting. We both welcome thoughtful postings.

Second, (surprise) I pretty much agree with your perspective about reforming the prisons. Having able-bodied prisoners perform some kind of labor that actually helps rebuild the countries infastucture seems to be economically sound and better than just caging them for x amount of time with no other benefit to society. As long as they can’t escape.

Third, though I consider myself to be a “liberal”, in general, that’s too broad a term to cover all possible situations in the real world. In my case, I happen to favor the death penalty, selectively, for people who choose to kill deliberately or for profit. But I have a special venom for people who beat and kill their wives and or children. Or anyone who abuses a child in all the various ways I don’t need to spell out here. Preying on the helpless or disabled is beastial and deserving of effective resolution. Such people do not deserve a second chance. The damage of their horifying behavior on thier victims is permanent.

I agree about not arbitrarily deciding a sentence based on whose death is more important, factoring in either job or economic status. Pre-meditated killing is killing, be it based on robbery, revenge, rascism, organized crime or for profit. Self-defense or protecting another is not the same thing, nor is provable involuntary manslaughter.

I agree that there should be stadardization of what crimes require what punishments so that one state isn’t a pushover for serious crimes and another is Texas. I don’t see the states as little countries, but as historically-created separate parts of a modern and unified whole.

I do see that social progress does originate in some more enlightened legislatures, and the country progresses as an entity as the newer ideas slowly spread across the country. But perhaps there can be two levels of what is designated as standard for all, like for example, voting rights or civil rights or criminal behavior. Then another more wait-and-see regional decisions that need more time for different people to adjust to contemporary waves of social change, like gay marriage or experiments in improving public education, for example.

Some ideas need more time to gestate and become accepted, and the individual states serve as examples of how new ideas work while the rest of the country watches and learns.

For the record, I favor full and equal rights for all variations of sexual preference catagories including marriage. My gay cousins are as deserving as I am of legal companionship, tax benefits, inheritance and medical visitation rights. They are entitled to be happy and free to run their own lives, just like me.

I don’t impose my religious beliefs on other people and they can’t impose theirs on me. Or you. A nation of laws and not zealot’s agendas seems fair to me.

I look forward to reading more of your ideas, Russ, whether you and I agree, or not.

Thanks again,

Bob Katzman

Comment by Don Larson

September 2, 2008 @ 9:19 am

“frat-boy-meets-the Peter-Principle-to-the-Nth-power”

That apt description could easily apply to Barack Obama until he proves himself in his first Executive position. That is, if he gets the chance. 🙂

Don

Comment by Don Larson

September 2, 2008 @ 11:12 pm

The Sheriff in Phoenix, Arizona has a wonderful protocol for prisoners serving time in his custody. Most prisoners there don’t want to come back to his jail after their release. I would say template his approach across all other jurisdictions and watch crime go down.

I’m in favor of the death penalty. I’m in favor of the Three Strikes Law here in California. The Right to Bear Arms is always in effect as a first resort for citizens to protect themselves.

I think the jury system works fine. A peer group of individuals decides on each case they hear and renders their verdict. Jury members are free to make their decisions and can take all the aspects of the trial under consideration. Often juries use jury nullification and therefore an escape clause exists in those cases where that is used. For all the drug cases that come about by people using illegal drugs, they have their chance in court to give their side of the story. So I’m not in favor of repealing drug laws to encourage an increase in drug use over what illegal levels already exist.

I’m sure there is room for improvement and adjustments to government laws and enforcement policies. I’m looking forward to a day when citizens who protect themselves using force are no longer hassled for doing so. I count on the NRA to help get us there. 🙂

Don

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>